
Photo: Canva
Golf Digest reports how golf retail theft is nothing new, but criminals have taken things to a whole new level.
There’s a drastic increase in both general theft and smash-and-grabs, where the front glass doors of a retail store are destroyed and clubs are snatched away. From physical objects to vehicles, criminals are using whatever they can find to smash through the front of golf retail stores.
The vice president of cybersecurity and loss prevention for the Worldwide Golf Shops, Mike Mata, explains how “the game has become so popular. The market is so much bigger than it used to be, the equipment is so desirable and the stuff is just so easy to move.”
Golf Digest also notes, “Maybe the biggest factor is that golfers are eager to take advantage of even the slightest discount. Online selling sites like eBay, Facebook Marketplace, Craigslist, OfferUp and Amazon have provided the perfect vehicle for dealing stolen goods without any questions asked.”
These thefts can have negative repercussions on the retail prices of golf clubs and golf balls, but there are currently no clear methods of tracking the impact. Stores are also hurt by the fact that they need to “restock the inventory of premium clubheads from multiple manufacturers in the quick timeline necessitated by golf’s revolving product cycles.”
In order to prevent crime or retrieve stolen goods, “the leading golf retailers are monitoring thefts closely and are engaging with law enforcement,” according to Golf Digest. If a thief gets arrested, it’s likely because the retailers involved have handled much of the legwork to find the culprits. This typically includes surveying “new” club sales on resale websites and, “in Mata’s case, going undercover to catch someone selling clubs stolen from one of Worldwide’s stores.”
Many states are also mandating new legislation that requires sellers to share more information on auction sites, “presumably to dissuade the thieves.” Additionally, states like California have “increased the funding of the CHP’s special taskforce on organized retail crime, which should continue to pay benefits by making it clear to criminals that there’s a new point of emphasis.”
Although many thieves have been caught lately while hoarding and selling stolen goods, stolen products can also be shipped and sold internationally, making criminals even more difficult to trace.
The solution to this problem requires help from the platforms that sell used and discounted merchandise. For example, “OfferUp will inform customers of their responsibility to contact law enforcement about potential stolen goods being sold on its site, but that only goes so far. OfferUp has a team investigating so-called ‘bad items and users on the platform,’ but it also states that ‘to ensure user privacy’ it will not disclose personal details of sellers ‘without substantiated requests from [law enforcement] officials.’”
There are other drastic measures taking place to help curb the likelihood of crime, namely changing up the ways that golf retail stores work experientially. It’s understood that “golfers need to waggle clubs in the aisle, make a few swings in a hitting bay, or test on a huge putting green,” and Golf Digest states that turning the experience into an appointment-only atmosphere “with everything locked down like baby formula or razors” doesn’t always work as a business model, “but some sellers like Club Champion and GOLFTEC are doing just that.”
Perhaps there are other methods to help prevent and decrease the amount of theft occurring in golf shops and general retail stores. The New York Post reports firsthand how shoplifting rings are set up across different cities and enlist help from homeless people to walk into stores and steal items from a list.
As Ted McCaffrey, omnichannel champion and retail expert, states, “Tagging these items with RFID, and setting up Smart Exits will provide the authorities with the data to make these criminals an ‘offer they can’t refuse.’”
BrainTrust
Neil Saunders
Managing Director, GlobalData
Bob Phibbs
President/CEO, The Retail Doctor
Cathy Hotka
Principal, Cathy Hotka & Associates
Discussion Questions
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: What measures should buyers take before purchasing products that have “too-good-to-be-true” prices online? What are some other ways that reselling platforms can prevent the sale of stolen goods?

What’s happening to golf retailers is a microcosm for the rest of the retail industry. Crime and thefts are up, especially brazen shoplifting. It is all very well to talk about resale platforms preventing the sale of stolen good: they certainly have a role to play, but the surge in theft is not helped by a permissive attitude to retail crime with some states, like California, downgrading shoplifting items under a certain value to a misdemeanor. Bluntly, some politicians have made crime pay. This is especially so for a category like golf where, because of its popularity, it is very easy to resell stolen items. Retailers and honest consumers pay the price in the form of lower profits, higher prices, and stores where goods are locked down and hard to browse. It’s a sad situation.
How about some high profile audits, and arrests, and convictions, and consequences…??? How about some renewed lessons in how crime doesn’t pay…???
Jeff, yes, “How about…”
Have we judged there is no victim in retail theft? “Oh, they are big companies and make lots of money. They won’t even miss this.”
Gene, not sure where you are going with your question. Of course there are victims in retail theft. Property destruction in smash and grabs. Terrorized employees and customers (Nordstrom incident). Retailer profitability. Devalued brands as stolen property is sold for low prices. You and I, as we pay higher prices as brands and retailers try to cope with rising theft. And the answers lie in both prevention and deterrence at the front end and prosecution at the back end.
Of course, there are very real victims, as you describe. I am suggesting that, as a culture, we do not appreciate the consequences of retail theft. The shoplifter justifies it thinking the retailer won’t even miss it. The citizen sees the viral Nordstum video and says, “Oh, that is terrible.” and goes about their day without a second thought.
The victims, as we all know, are the brands, their employees, and their consumers. Any thief that rationalizes their actions by saying “big company, they won’t miss it, I am entitled to it, blah blah blah blah, is still a thief. I just wonder if their will be some kind of tipping point here with a vigilante episode, etc. That will make the news. Some guy loading up his car with stuff? Or people smashing a window and taking out TV’s during a “mostly peaceful” demonstration? Not so much.
Indeed, and those big companies also form part of pension funds and other investments which benefit everyday people. Retail theft is not a victimless crime. It never has been.
Unfortunately, there are no easy answers. Drug addiction is up, the products are easily lifted, there is a willing market to buy and little in the way of tracking. I agree RFID is helpful, but just saying higher penalties isn’t the answer. The sheer volume of theft is increasing globally and understanding the many touch points to the item being stolen and resold is key.
Ted McCaffrey is correct. We have to come up with structural changes that thwart these thieves and allow businesses to operate as usual. I’ll imagine that retailers that implement these technologies will put stickers on their front doors informing potential thieves that they can’t get away with it.
If they are worried about the merchandise being stolen, they should probably just not make the purchase. If they have no “moral compass” and are okay with the risk, then buy it-but with the knowledge that you may be aiding and abetting a horrific trend.
Any reselling platform that takes, say, a brand new Titleist Driver for a great price needs to “smell the coffee”…the item was taken. Slightly used? Maybe.
Much has been written about this trend, I will add just a bit. Brazen theft is killing San Francisco. And store employees who try to intervene in any way (I am looking at YOU Lululemon) get fired. Golf gear is expensive so this is no surprise. And the class aspect of it (the “downtrodden” taking from those wealthy golf playing elitists!) is a natural topic for a better writer than me.
I mean, when CNN is interviewing someone in a Walgreens and the camera catches a thief walking out with hands full of stuff (“did he buy that”)…that is embarrassing.
I predict this story will take off if and when a big smash and grab theft happens somewhere exclusive…say the Pebble Beach pro shop…it may make the news. May.
Los Angeles Nordstrom last Saturday, 50 thieves broke in and stole $100K https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/group-50-people-shoplift-100k-luxury-items-l-mall-used-bear-spray-guar-rcna99598?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma&taid=64dac014b69a810001a20433&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
The criminals who were caught looting the Nike store on Michigan Avenue in Chicago were quoted as saying “Nike has insurance”
Theft is up. But it’s not new. Unfortunately, this is a chronic problem. I’ve bought items on websites for what seems like less than cost. Typically they are close-outs, last year’s models, etc. One caution I have for retailers in any industry. Be careful not to punish the honest people for the sins of a few. Creating a bad experience to prevent theft is simply a bad experience, regardless of the reason. Customers may continue to do business with the retailer, but only until someone offering a better experience comes along.
Thanks Shep for pointing out the main – or at least ONE of the main – problem here: separating honestly low prices from DIS-honestly low ones (and thanks, too, for not joining the other in [overly]politicized rants.)
“but that only goes so far” I think sums up pretty well where I foresee most of these efforts going. This is actually an age-old issue, of course; I can remember an article in ‘Model Railroader’, of all places, many years ago discussing ways to reduce sale of stolen items; unfortunately, the ideas put forth then, as now, inevitably bring a conflict between legitimate sales and illegitimate ones. Ideas like requiring vendors to show proof of purchase are virtually impossible to enforce for an online site – certainly for the buyer – and would seemingly eliminate one of the main advantages of such platforms: ordinary people trading their un-used/needed items for cash.